lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:28:39 +0200
From: Paul Sebastian Ziegler <psz@...erved.de>
To: n n <s_x_dls@...mail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: requesting info

> also what is the right procedure to make in order to publish a new hacking 
> technique to that it's know by the name of the publisher

First make sure that it is actually a NEW technique. If you just
discovered a new flavor of XSS or some addition to another technique it
won't work. Make sure you know _exactly_ what you are talking about
before releasing such a thing.
Then write _documentation_. That is the key issue. I have no idea who
first came up with BufferOverflows. But I'm pretty sure almost everybody
knows AlephOne. FYI: When he wrote "Smashing the stack for fun and
profit" those attacks had already been around for about a decade.
But his paper hit it off - so he is remembered for it.

Oh, and most off all: Check your attitude.
If your primary intention is fame then there is probably something
wrong. If you are 1337 enough, you'll get accreditation.

MTC
Paul

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ