full-disclosure - Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:28:13 -0700
From: h4h <aza@...teh8.org>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, dailydave@...ts.immunitysec.com
Subject: Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about
	ExecShield (without NX)

On 5/14/07, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:13:19 EDT, Brad Spengler said:
>
> > Ingo knows about this (I mailed him privately about the problems I saw
> > with Fedora Core 3, which resulted in an updated kernel -- though I
>
> Dude, Fedora Core 3 was like 2 frikking years ago.  I suppose it's OK
> for us to diss the grsecurity patch today because there were bugs in 2.1.5
> ?
> (I have a grsecurity-2.1.5-2.6.11.9-200505121617.patch.gz hanging around
> which dates back to just about the same time as FC3 was released).
>
> Now if you want to discuss the execshield implementation that's currently
> shipping in FC6 or the about-to-escape FC7, we'll be more than happy to
> listen.


Is that really the only thing you could find in spenders post to complain
about, Valdis?  Are the rest of his points therefor moot? lol.

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/