full-disclosure - Re: Does this exist ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:14:17 -0500
From: Dan Becker <list@...nixsolutions.com>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Does this exist ?

Others have pointed out a database would work for common packets and  
yet others have pointed out much beyond that scope the idea is not  
feasible.

I have another question. Would moving the TCP stack to base 32 double  
traffic ?

We have enough alphanumeric characters to do so. Perhaps a designation  
of 1x000 instead of 0x000 to define the difference in base 32 to base  
16 respectively.

Or am I missing something you uber math types can explain to me.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

      All message scanned for viruses with Clam Antivirus.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/