lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:34:03 -0400 From: Byron Sonne <blsonne@...ers.com> To: Jared DeMott <demottja@....edu> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Right, or wrong? > Is it morally right, wrong, don't know, don't care, good business, bad > business, etc.? Either way we're moving away from that model, but I was > just curious how others on FD see it. It's lame, as I see it. IMO, as soon as a bug/vuln is found it should be released into the public domain, with as wide a circulation as possible, and free of charge. This way as much damage, mischief and chaos as possible can be sown. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists