lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 21:48:06 -0400
From: "Sol_Invictus" <sol@...eyoubeentested.org>
To: "'Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor'" <evdo.hsdpa@...il.com>,
	"'Jared DeMott'" <demottja@....edu>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Right, or wrong?

Gates doesn't have bugs... He has Features!  ;-)

My 2 cents?  Anyone trying to sell a bug to the vendor with the problem is
extortion.  Feel free to sell it to others, but only AFTER giving the vendor
a chance to fix it.  If the vendor ignores you then that's what FD is all
about... but please lets be responsible out there!

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Robert Kim
Wireless Internet Advisor
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 8:06 PM
To: Jared DeMott
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Right, or wrong?

Ask gates what his business position is regarding bugs

On 8/7/07, Jared DeMott <demottja@....edu> wrote:
> All:
>
> So, I've tried the vendor pay model for bug hunting and it wasn't always
> well received.  Apparently auction sites and 3 party purchasers are
> fine, but some folks don't like the idea of selling directly to the
> vendor.  I was thinking that this would be ideal since the vendor would
> have the most interest in knowing about/fixing the bug.  My question to
> the list is this:
> Is it morally right, wrong, don't know, don't care, good business, bad
> business, etc.?  Either way we're moving away from that model, but I was
> just curious how others on FD see it.
>
> Blessings,
> Jared
> --
Robert Q Kim, Wireless Internet Provider
http://evdo-coverage.com/satellite-wireless-internet.html
http://groups.google.com/group/unpaid-overtime
2611 S. Pacific Coast Highway 101
Suite 203 Unpaid Overtime Dept
Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007
206 984 0880

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ