full-disclosure - Re: [Security Advisory] Backdoor Discovered inImmunity Debugger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:05:06 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: monikerd <monikerd@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Security Advisory] Backdoor Discovered
	inImmunity Debugger

On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:25:11 +0200, monikerd said:

> However off course the md5 hashes don't really
> say anything. Except that you would be able to
> verify that your copy is the one you obtained.

If you are unsure if your copy is the one you obtained, you have bigger
issues. ;)

An MD5 hash *will* however verify (to a fair extent, modulo intended
attacks) if the copy you have is identical to the copy that was originally
shipped (if they don't match, it shows that the copy you obtained isn't
the one originally shipped).

Yes, I'm splitting hairs here - but in cryptography, such hairs are often
the basis of the security.  So it's important to keep straight which bits
are which....

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/