lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:10:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
To: security curmudgeon <jericho@...rition.org>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...re.org>, websecurity@...appsec.org
Subject: Re: SecNiche : Microsoft Internet Explorer Pop up
 Blocker Bypassing and Dos Vulner


On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, security curmudgeon wrote:

> OSVDB did not begin agressively tracking and cataloging myth/fake
> vulnerabilities until earlier this year.

CVE began a similar practice by using a "** DISPUTED **" or "** REJECT **"
string in the descriptions.

> OSVDB will add legitimate vulnerabilities before myth/fake typically, so
> in some cases they are just at the bottom of the queue.

Same with CVE; so if we've determined that a researcher has a very bad
track record, we'll de-prioritize them on our queue.  We don't keep a
specific list of reliable/unreliable researchers, however.  A resource
like that would be very useful.  Some unreliable researchers do improve,
however.

- Steve

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ