full-disclosure - Re: Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable ifbreached?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:38:02 +1000
From: "Kelly Robinson" <caliana1989@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable ifbreached?

Thank you so much for the input everyone, its really appreciated.

I have read so much about Disclaimers being a sense of false security and
how they dont hold any legal binding per se. However, given other rumours
about how emails can be used in court for the sake of evidence (Looking for
specific examples at the moment) I am wondering if Disclaimers can be
referenced in a courtroom in a client's defence and if not, is it specificly
stated or referenced that they can or cant - and if that is true, where am I
likely to find a factual document (reference) stating the fact?

Someone raised an interesting point about disclaimers and overseas mail /
laws. Thats got me thinking...and now my head is hurting.

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/