full-disclosure - Re: OpenID. The future of authentication on the web?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:22:09 -0500
From: "John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP" <bambenek.infosec@...il.com>
To: "Petko D. Petkov" <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Larry Seltzer <Larry@...ryseltzer.com>
Subject: Re: OpenID. The future of authentication on the
	web?

Well in my case it's easy... how many people do you know named John Bambenek
(my father doesn't count)? :)

I was just speaking about passwords in that case, presumably people can
remember their email addresses.

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Petko D. Petkov <
pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com> wrote:

> what about usernames? you still need to keep track of your usernames
> since sometimes your preferred username is either taken or not
> possible or you need to login via email or any other peculiarity the
> site supports.
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:43 PM, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP
> <bambenek.infosec@...il.com> wrote:
> > I would disagree.  One could simply create a template password and then
> salt
> > it with some acronym for the site in question.
> >
> > For instance, S0m3p4ss!### where ### is a 3-letter acronym for the site
> they
> > are accessing.  Still need only one password to remember and you don't
> > necessarily have a single point of 0wnership anymore.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Larry Seltzer <Larry@...ryseltzer.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >>I understand the attractiveness of not having to remember lots of
> IDs
> > > and passwords, but when you give up control of your data, you give up
> > > control of your future.
> > >
> > > Normal people aren't going to remember enough passwords, let alone
> > > strong passwords, to make that control meaningful. I do get your
> point,
> > > but I bet that the best alternative is to give them one set of
> > > credentials and make it as strong as possible.
> > >
> > >
> > > Larry Seltzer
> > > eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
> > > http://security.eweek.com/
> > > http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/
> > > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
> > > larry.seltzer@...fdavisenterprise.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >  Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >  Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >  Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Petko D. (pdp) Petkov | GNUCITIZEN | Hakiri | Spin Hunters
>
> gnucitizen.org | hakiri.org | spinhunters.org
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/