lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:56:30 -0300 From: M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado@...il.com> To: Throwaway1@...umbus.rr.com Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Free Iraq Throwaway1, there is absolutely no sense in evoking 1990's UN-authorized action to justify 2003's UN's-Security-Council-unauthorized-and-illegal invasion. Your childish reasoning is no more than a poor attempt of sophistic argumentation. Yours sincerely, On 3/26/08, Throwaway1@...umbus.rr.com <Throwaway1@...umbus.rr.com> wrote: > =========================================================================== > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:55 PM, net-dummy wrote: > > > > >Iraq is an invaded country, and America has no right to be there at all. > > > > Actually, dummy... > The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August of 1990 led to a United Nations > authorization to remove Saddam's forces from Kuwait. This military action > was carried mainly by the Americans for entirely practical reasons. The > United Nations halted hostilities and declared that a ceasefire would be in > effect as long as Saddam cooperated fully with United Nations Inspectors > who were looking for an extensive list of banned weapons, which included > but was by no means limited to; chemical, biological and > nuclear/radiological weapons. > After over a decade of continual failure to cooperate, the American > political leadership decided that they could no longer take the same > patient approach that they had taken for the previous 12 years; and resumed > hostilities. After invading Iraq and removing Saddam, American forces > searched for the aforementioned list of banned weapons, and while they > found most of them they did not find stockpiles of weaponized biologicals, > final stage chemicals or nuclear/radiologicals. Whether you believe this is > because Saddam didn't possess them at the time of the invasion or that he > simply did a better job of hiding them than the American's did of looking > for them doesn't change the facts. Nor does your opinion of the current > American administration or your opinion of their actions. > > However, the most disturbing part of your post was not that you > demonstrated your ignorance once again... That is basically; your job here. > > No, the disturbing part of your asinine post was that you made Saddam's > murderous Ba'athist thugs the moral equivalent of the Free Tibetan People. > > THAT needed to be answered, or I would have ignore this post as I > ordinarily do to ALL of your posts. > > ============================================================================ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you? > http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > -- Marcio Barbado, Jr. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists