lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 13:31:08 -0400 From: G D Fuego <gdfuego@...il.com> To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: RE :OT - Don't fuck with n3td3v Wow. That is a spot on description of how you ate treating HD Moore and David Litchfield. On May 7, 2008, at 12:36 PM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 4:43 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote: >> On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:24:45 BST, n3td3v said: >> >>> And you suffer from slanderous libelous defamation disability >>> disorder, a new disorder I have made up for idiots on Full- >>> Disclosure. >> >> So you're saying he's suffering from a disorder that causes a >> disability in how >> well he can slander, libel, and defame somebody? If so, you should >> be glad >> that you weren't slandered by somebody *not* suffering from it.... > > Maybe not, but the situation currently on Full-Disclosure is this... > > False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of > their victim and turn other people against them. They post false > information about them on websites. They may set up their own > websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations > about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow > public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[4] > > Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may > approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain > personal information. They may advertise for information on the > Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the > victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an > effort to gather more information about their victims. [5] > > Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to > involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has > harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the > victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to > join the pursuit. > > False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is > harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in > a number of well-known cases. > > Attacks on data and equipment. They may try to damage the victim's > computer by sending viruses. > > Ordering goods and services. They order items or subscribe to > magazines in the victim's name. These often involve subscriptions to > pornography or ordering sex toys then having them delivered to the > victim's workplace. > > Arranging to meet. Young people face a particularly high risk of > having cyberstalkers try to set up meetings between them.[6] > > Cyberstalkers meet or target their victims by using search engines, > online forums, bulletin and discussion boards, chat rooms, Wikipedia, > and more recently, through online communities such as MySpace, > Facebook, Friendster and Indymedia, a media outlet known for > self-publishing. They may engage in live chat harassment or flaming or > they may send electronic viruses and unsolicited e-mails. [7] Victims > of cyberstalkers may not even know that they are being stalked. > Cyberstalkers may research individuals to feed their obsessions and > curiosity. Conversely, the acts of cyberstalkers may become more > intense, such as repeatedly instant messaging their targets. [8] > > More commonly they will post defamatory or derogatory statements about > their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books > designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby > initiating contact. [7] In some cases, they have been known to create > fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory or > pornographic content. > > When prosecuted, many stalkers have unsuccessfully attempted to > justify their behavior based on their use of public forums, as opposed > to direct contact. Once they get a reaction from the victim, they will > typically attempt to track or follow the victim's internet activity. > Classic cyberstalking behavior includes the tracing of the victim's IP > address in an attempt to verify their home or place of employment. [7] > > Some cyberstalking situations do evolve into physical stalking, and a > victim may experience abusive and excessive phone calls, vandalism, > threatening or obscene mail, trespassing, and physical assault.[7] > Moreover, many physical stalkers will use cyberstalking as another > method of harassing their victims.[9] [10] > > A 2007 study, led by Paige Padgett from the University of Texas Health > Science Center, found that there was a false degree of safety assumed > by women looking for love online.[11][12] > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists