lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:08:58 +0100
From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [funsec] Internet attacks against Georgian
	web s ites

By the way, Russian sites have been hacked as well. So why is everyone
only talking about the Georgian sites and infrastructure? If Russian
sites and infrastructure is down as well that means the Georgian
government has hacked them, doesn't it Or does it? Or is the whole
thing just a false flag by the U.S government underworld to infulence
McCain and Obama as they are potentially coming in to the white house?

It seems to me that there is bias towards Russia in the security
community and that people don't really care if Russia was hacked,
because the community seem to have already chosen who they like and
who they are going to support and who they are going to point blame
at.

I don't think westerners have ever liked Russia, so as soon as
something like this happens, folks straight away are bias towards
Russia.

You've got to remember this could easily be a false flag cyber attack
to setup Russia to make them look bad while ramping up cyber security
as a national security agenda as Marcus Sachs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU says in the Youtube video.

The reasons for a false flag cyber attack is there, the evidence has
been put in front of you by n3td3v.

This isn't just some false flag conspiracy, there are plausible
reasons why this could be a false flag.

In the video Marcus Sachs asked the audience for ways we could make
cyber security a national security agenda, false flagging something
like the Georgian and Russian websites and infrastructure is not a way
the government underworld might make cyber security a national
security agenda?

I call a false flag, and I find it suspicious that people are only
talking about the Georgian websites and infrastructure being cyber
attacked and not the Russian stuff as well.

I would be interested in what answers the audience gave to Marcus
Sachs, but thats not in the video unfortunately.

All the best,

n3td3v

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ