full-disclosure - Re: security industry software license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:36:47 +0100
From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: security industry software license

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:28 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:15:16 BST, n3td3v said:
>> i have recieved a tip off that says metasploit has no privacy policy
>> and folks downloading from metasploit are possibly being dhs'd.
>
> Do the world a favor, and use whatever grey stuff hasn't leaked out of
> your cranial cavity and *think* for a moment.
>
> What would get reported to DHS:
>
> 1) Downloads by people that don't matter, because they'd almost certainly
> qualify for any sane program to license that sort of software.
>
> 2) Downloads by ankle-biting skript kiddies, who can be ignored because they
> were dumb enough to download from their own computer.
>
> What *won't* get reported to DHS:
>
> 1) Downloads by black hats smart enough to use somebody else's pwned system
> or TOR or something to cover their tracks.
>
>

but the question still remains: why no privacy policy? let's see if we
can challenge hd moore and his crew to write one, otherwise his site
will stink of shadowcrew entrapment, even if its not.

all the best,

n3td3v

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/