full-disclosure - Re: NTLM Multiprotocol Replay attacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:54:26 -0500
From: "Trollie Fingers" <trolliefingers@...il.com>
To: william@...kovics.net
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: NTLM Multiprotocol Replay attacks

 *he'd probably be on shaky ground if he wrote a book *specifically* about
the hacks that got him landed in jail.*

[snip]
Now that the statute of limitations has lifted on many of his crimes -- as
well as a seven-year court ban prohibiting him from writing about them (the
ban ended midnight on January 28, 2007) -- former hacker Kevin Mitnick is
telling his story in a book to be published next year.
[/snip]

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/kevin-mitnick-t.html

FYI.  I don't subscribe to the belief that criminals cannot talk about their
crimes.  That is ridiculous.  They become popular because people have
interest.  If there were no interest then this wouldn't be an issue.

I also don't think we should prevent people from arranging words as they sit
fit on printed items.  Isn't there some sort of amendment over here that
protects this kind of thing? (For those in Ermerika.)

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:24 PM, william@...kovics.net <
william@...kovics.net> wrote:

> OJ was acquitted of the crime allegedly admitted in his "book". He could
> profit from it then, right?
>
> Of course, he does have a huge debt from the related civil suit he lost and
> any money he makes from anything is fair game.  OJ is not a good example
> there... well, unless he writes a book on his most recent conviction for
> armed robbery/kidnapping here in Las Vegas.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
> *Sent*: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:31 AM
> *To*: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> *Subject*: Re: [Full-disclosure] NTLM Multiprotocol Replay attacks
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:46:50 GMT, n3td3v said:
>
> > We should bring in a law to stop criminal hackers from profiteering
> > from their crimes or otherwise reaching any kind of stardom.
>
> You might want to actually investigate what the law really is in your area.
>
> In most areas, there already *are* laws that specifically prohibit or
> severely restrict a convicted felon's ability to profit from their
> notoriety by selling interviews/books/film rights/etc regarding the
> crime in question. This is why OJ Simpson will probably see next to
> zero profits from any "How I did it" books he tries to sell (the victim's
> family has first claim on that money), and why Kevin Mitnick can write
> a book about 'The Art of Deception' and make money off it, but he'd
> probably
> be on shaky ground if he wrote a book *specifically* about the hacks that
> got him landed in jail.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/