lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:11:18 -0500 From: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> To: "Andy McKnight" <andy.mcknight@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored all speculation: no 1 knows 4 sure. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/ http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article w/out stealing ppls work. pay attention. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@...il.com> wrote: > 2008/12/2 Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> >> >> u arent getting it. >> >> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual >> backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can >> acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has >> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any >> system, patched or not. pay attention. > > I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored > here. The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal terms > could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files > available through P2P to full remote system access. > > Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other > than this statement? > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists