full-disclosure - Re: More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:28:08 -0500
From: "j-f sentier" <j.sentiar@...il.com>
To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: More proof that Microsoft products are
	probably backdoored

If there's a peace of shit around here that should be flushed, it's only you
n3tcr4p
No one like you, get the fuck back on your kiddie mailing list/group.




2008/12/3 n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>

> You're like a shite that won't flush away.
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:
> > all speculation:
> >
> > no 1 knows 4 sure.
> >
> > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/
> >
> > http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm
> >
> > c how i did that n3td3v?  i posted links, nd talked about the article
> > w/out stealing ppls work.
> >
> > pay attention.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@...il.com>
> wrote:
> >> 2008/12/2 Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
> >>>
> >>> u arent getting it.
> >>>
> >>> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors.  they r talking about actual
> >>> backdoors in the code.  so that anyone who knows the backdoor can
> >>> acess any windows system regarless.  they r saying that microsoft has
> >>> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any
> >>> system, patched or not.  pay attention.
> >>
> >> I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be
> backdoored
> >> here.  The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal
> terms
> >> could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files
> >> available through P2P to full remote system access.
> >>
> >> Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present
> other
> >> than this statement?
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/