full-disclosure - Re: Hackery Channel 01-09-01-LOLZ: Cat Spoofing against Flow Control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:57:40 -0500
From: Charles Morris <charlesmorris@...il.com>
To: hack ery <hackery.channel@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Hackery Channel 01-09-01-LOLZ: Cat Spoofing
	against Flow Control

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM, hack ery <hackery.channel@...il.com> wrote:
> Security Risk:  High
> Exploitable: Local
> Vulnerability: Arbitrary Flow Control Control, Cat Spoofing
> Discovered by: The Hackery Channel
> Tested: No
>
> The Flow Control project is an access control project for a cat.  It
> consists of a cat door, an electromagnetic latch, a access control device,
> and image recognition software that allows Flow to enter the house, and only
> when she is not carrying prey.  When Flow is within proximity of the door,
> she passes through a light that casts a shadow on an area monitored by a
> camera.  If the silouhette, appears to be  Flow without prey, access is
> granted.
>
> Cat Spoofing:  An attacker could potentially gain access by posing as a
> kitty by placing a cut out of the kitty next to the light.
>
> Mitigation: None.
> Work around: Guard dog
> Vendor Notified: No
> Vendor Site: http://www.quantumpicture.com/Flo_Control/flo_control.htm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

The solution of course would be to clone the system and take a
vertical image, creating a decent 3-D map of the Cat attempt. What
about two-factor authentication? I'm thinking a mass spectrometer
reading in combination with the facial recognition. That could detect
a Cat spoofing and/or brute-force attack with a bust or cardboard
cut-outs. With any biometric authentication it's going to be expensive
and have all kinds of bugs and quirks... just teach him a password..
sheesh.

-- 
Charles Morris
       cmorris@...odu.edu,
       cmorris@...s.odu.edu

Network Security Administrator,
Software Developer

Office of Computing and Communications Services,
CS Systems Group              Old Dominion University
http://www.cs.odu.edu/~cmorris

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/