full-disclosure - Re: Windows 7 UAC compromised

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:57:03 +0200
From: Yudi Rosen <yr42.lists@...il.com>
To: Jimmy Astle <astle.j@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Windows 7 UAC compromised

But Joe the Plumber doesn't want to have to click on endless 'confirm'
dialogs every time he tries to use the computer. Simply having him run as a
non-admin user only fixes half the problem.

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Jimmy Astle <astle.j@...il.com> wrote:

> I am new to the list so hello to everyone.....
>
> Now for the Windows 7 UAC stuff.
>
> 1.) Its beta.... its not going to be perfect wait for RC1 before selling 7
> down the river.
> 2.)
> http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/app-security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=213001021&subSection=News
>
>                It all comes back to windows biggest issue, joe the plumber
> shouldn't not be running as a local admin on his box. UAC problem solved!  I
> still dont see how redmond missed the concept.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Miller Grey <vigilantgregorius@...il.com>wrote:
>
>> ...what?
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM, M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Windows says: Hello world! Check this out, world, this is really cool.
>>> Now I have, uh, something like, uh, "privileges management"!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "UAC" is no more than a new commercial designation for something with
>>> about 40 years.
>>> And they (Redmond) are still missing the concept's point.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Christopher Pritchard
>>> <mailinglist@...iniacghost.co.uk> wrote:
>>> >> The biggest issue here is that although it's technically easy to fix
>>> >> this problem (just have UAC issue an alert when somebody's messing
>>> with
>>> >> the system settings), it involves doing more of what end users dislike
>>> >> most about UAC (it issuing alerts to Joe Sixpack all the time when he
>>> >> does something bone-headed security-wise).
>>> >>
>>> >> Fixing this one in a way that users will put up with will be a bitch.
>>> >
>>> > Why not just have it not prompt if you are changing settings, except
>>> for UAC settings? that would be the simple way around it
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marcio Barbado, Jr.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/