full-disclosure - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:32:02 +0000
From: Matt <weysec@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: The BBC acquired a botnet,
	but was it legal? - Update

What makes this unacceptable? Buying a botnet and turning it off. Hurah
for them! Unstuff your shirts and get on with your lives.

Sent to you by Matt via Google Reader: Re: The BBC acquired a botnet,
but was it legal? - Update via Full Disclosure (fulldisclosure) Mailing
List on 3/16/09 Posted by James Matthews on Mar 16

No it's not acceptable! But they seem to do what ever suits them!

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Ivan . <ivanhec_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> According to Struan Robertson, a technology lawyer with Pinsent
> Masons, in a posting on Out-Law.com, the BBC's statement that the
> ...

Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Full Disclosure (fulldisclosure) Mailing List using
Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/