full-disclosure - Re: Just Asking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:14:31 +0100
From: Ew0k <sekuritymatter@...il.com>
To: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Just Asking

Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Nothing is more impressive than some anonymous twit attacking someone who 
> does their research under their own name with stolen information they 
> should not have to begin with and then selectively publishing only that 
> which bolsters their supposed case.
>
> --On August 2, 2009 12:03:18 AM +0100 Ew0k <sekuritymatter@...il.com> 
> wrote:
>
>   
>> A friend of mine observed something that I believe should be put on the
>> table.
>> While reading the e-mails sent back and forth by Dan Kaminsky, illegally
>> published on zf05 one of the e-mails caught his eye:
>>
>> """
>>
>> Dan,
>>
>>
>> This is another of our clients and you do not have the permission of the
>> client to perform this kind of scanning.
>> You have triggered over 22,000 events for us in this range alone as well
>> as caused a few other minor aggravations.
>> While you may believe you are a researcher and doing good, performing
>> your unauthorized testing on live production platforms is a reportable
>> offense.
>> I am going to kindly suggest you seek permission from various targets
>> before you continue your "research".
>> Please note I am under contractual obligations to report your
>> activities, we have recorded your "scans" on over 26 devices globally
>> and none of our clients have given you permission to perform these
>> "tests"
>>
>> """
>>
>> Now, according to this e-mail should Dan's CISSP certification be
>> revised?
>>     
>
>
>
> Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
> obvious, my opinions are my own
> and not those of my employer.
> ******************************************
> WARNING: Check the headers before replying
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>   
There was no need to offend, plus you "defended you man" but didn't 
answer my question, so if I were you I would just shut up.

-- 
Ew0k
-
Anxiety generates errors, and errors create oportunities...
http://sekuritymatters.wordpress.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/