full-disclosure - Re: Slander of security researcher n3td3v

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:17:08 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Slander of security researcher n3td3v

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:43:45 CDT, someone lawyer said:

> Comment lead to the belief list wants to mock my client.

Please note that "the list" is merely an aggregation of names, and as such, is
no more able to "want to mock your client" than your phone book may wish to do
so.  And even if you interpret "the list" as the collection of subscribers,
that *still* doesn't work, because the subscribers on the full-disclosure list
are famous for not agreeing about much of anything. If they agreed that your
client deserved mocking, it would be the first thing they've been in agreement
on.

But you might want to have a chat with your phone book, see how it feels
about your client.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/