full-disclosure - Re: why not a sandbox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:28:15 -0500
From: Fatherlaptop <fatherlaptop@...il.com>
To: Kurth Bemis <kurth.bemis@...il.com>
Cc: RandallM <randallm@...mail.com>,
	"full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: why not a sandbox

ok. that's cool. not sure about enterprise compatibility or my English  
but will check it out. my other option is front end. Lately, we have  
ha "lots" of drive by infections. I have though "trained" users and  
get calls on the "fake alert" box.

It's a 3GS iPhone Thang!

On Sep 4, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Kurth Bemis <kurth.bemis@...il.com> wrote:

> Check out:
>
> http://www.sandboxie.com/
> http://www.xenocode.com/Browsers/
>
> ~k
>
> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 13:05 -0500, RandallM wrote:
>> how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the system.
>> its the users that just get gmail and click links, watch youtube vids
>> and check FaceBook and Mypace that infect the network!
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/