full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows TCP/IP Timestamps Code Execution Vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:04:39 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Ivan Security <ivanchukl@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows TCP/IP Timestamps Code
	Execution Vulnerability

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:55:13 -0300, Ivan Security said:
> Discover the problem by binary difference is quite hard and if it were
> achiveable, which files should we compare?. 
...
>                                              I could patch it and then
> compare the corresponding binary files.

There you go - if you can get a patch for that one vuln separate from
the pachydermic Patch Tuesday mega-patch, you'll probably find that the fix
only hits 1 or 2 functions, at which point a binary diff and a good
debugging tool should be enough to figure out the rest of the details...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/