Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:48:48 +0100
From: Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez <shadown@...il.com>
To: Anthony Desnos <desnos@...ea.fr>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: iAWACS 2010 : Rules of the PWN2KILL contest

Hi,

I see a lot of 'what the participants have to do' and 'what the  
participants have to give away', but I don't see anywhere what the  
winner/s of the contest would win in all this.
Where can I find that information? in order to decide if it is worth  
participating or not.

Thanks in advance.

Cheers,
    sergio

On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Anthony Desnos wrote:

> iAWACS 2010 : Rules of the PWN2KILL contest
> *****************************
> http://www.esiea-recherche.eu/iawacs2010/
>
>
> The PWN2KILL Contest aims at performing a comparative evaluation of
> commercial
> antivirus software against actual threats.
>
> An actual threat can be defined as any threat that is operationnally
> viable. The
> purpose is to show that given fixed actual malware threats, the  
> different
> existing antivirus software are of inequal quality. While a few of  
> them
> are able
> to proactively detect unknown malware using known malware techniques,
> most of
> them are just able to detect most of the known malware (not all of  
> them).
>
> Moreover, the in-depth analysis of existing antivirus software shows  
> that a
> significant number of malware technique that have been published -- by
> hackers,
> malware writers, researchers in computer security and computer  
> virology
> -- are
> still not taken into account by commercial antivirus products while  
> those
> techniques indeed represent actual threats. Consequently, it is more
> than useful
> for the end user and the final consumer (since AV software are  
> products
> that we
> buy) to know which antivirus at the less worst and which are the  
> worst.
>
> The contest board will be composed of a bailiff, of five professional
> journalists from the computer technical press and of three  
> personalities
> from
> the scientific/hacking community renowned for their personal ethics  
> and
> skills.
>
> His role will be to record the test results, decide of their validity
> and elect
> the three most efficient attacks.
>
> The contest will be based on the only admissible approach: the
> experiment and
> the attacker's view.
>
> The rules are very simple:
>   1.- A number of computers -- each of them with an antivirus  
> installed --
>       will be available. The environment will be
>       - Windows 7 (in a virtual machine for an easy reconfiguration
> purpose).
>       - User mode (without privilege).
>       - No connection to the Internet (to avoid ``external'' attacks  
> or
>         manipulation during the contest). However to enable truly
> network-based
>         attacks (input and/or output data), it will be possible upon
> request
>         to open temporarily an access to the Internet provided that no
> attack
>         will be launched from the testing machine towards external  
> systems.
>       - Common applications installed (Microsoft suite, OpenOffice  
> Suite,
>         Pdf reader...). Any additional application can be added upon
> request
>         or can be used through personal USB devices.
>       - A printer will be available through the network (spec data
> available
>         upon request).
>
>   2.- Each participant will come with his (malware) code(s) to test
> against
>       the antivirus software. He can perform any action that a normal
> user can
>       do (including rebooting the computer, closing a session, using  
> USB
>       devices...). In case of ``proactive'' warning from the operating
> system
>       or from any application, the user is free to follow them or not.
> Any user
>       has not to be an expert in computers in order to evaluate and
> interpret
>       technical warnings that sometimes refers to normal behaviours.  
> As an
>       example, warnings like ``an application is attempting to become
> resident.
>       Do you allow it?'' has no meaning for a grandmother using a
> computer.
>       She is free to allow it!
>
>   3.- In order to make a comparative and fair testing, any code must  
> be
> tested
>       against ALL antivirus selected for the challenge. The test will
> consist
>       in two step~: first the code(s) will be scanned (on demand  
> analysis)
>       then used as intended (on-access analysis).
>
>   4.- Any participant will have first to announce what effect/attack  
> he
> intends
>       to perform. The board will decide whether this attack is
> admissible or
>       not. An admissible attack is an attack which affect  
> availability,
>       integrity and/or confidentiality of the system and/or the data  
> (data
>       system, user data...).
>
>   5.- Any participant will have to write a short technical summary  
> of his
>       attack(s) which will be published on the iAWACS website. He will
> have to
>       present his attack(s) during the contest debriefing. A copy of
> its code
>       will be given to the organizers of the challenge.
>
> For fairness purposes, no participants working for any AV company or  
> any
> company sharing common interest with AV companies, will be allowed to
> participate. Any participant will thus have to sign an assessment form
> confirming he is not working for such companies.
>
> The organizers of iAWACS 2010 and of the PWN2KILL challenge have
> selected the
> following antivirus software:
>   -- Avast
>   -- AVG
>   -- Avira
>   -- BitDefender
>   -- DrWeb
>   -- FSecure
>   -- GData
>   -- Kasperky
>   -- McAfee
>   -- Microsoft AV
>   -- NOD 32
>   -- Norton Symantec
>   -- Trend Micro
>
> Only commercial licences will be tested -- in other words they will be
> anonymously bought in public stores/website (no demo or free version).
> The antivirus will be updated right before the beginning of the  
> challenge.
>
> The organizers will publish a technical summary of the results once
> validated
> by the contest board. No communication will be done directly towards  
> the AV
> vendors. Only a technical communication and press conference will be
> organized
> during the iAWACS event. A technical summary will be available on the
> iAWACS
> website. The complete data and codes collected will be communicated  
> only
> to the
> French CERT-A for analysis and feedbacks. No code will be neither
> published nor
> distributed.
>
> Any participant is free to communicate later on about his test/code/ 
> attack
> performed during the contest. In this case, iAWACS organizers are not
> responsible for that communication.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists