full-disclosure - Re: Vuln Disclosure summarized (TTBOMA)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:17:22 +0200
From: Thierry Zoller <Thierry@...ler.lu>
To: Rob Fuller <jd.mubix@...il.com>
Cc: "ML: full-disclosure" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Vuln Disclosure summarized (TTBOMA)


Hello,

Your missing legislative circumstances in your thoughts :

>- Releasing at a conference => Probable court time.
Under what legislation would that potentially be the case ?

>- Keeping it to yourself => Working under the assumption that your the
>only one that has found that same bug is still semi relevant due to
>the incredibly small size of the exploit dev community. However, as
>Dave said, they'll be toasting to their sleeping dead 0days some day.
Under  the  jurisdiction  I  personaly  am under I am responsbile if I
DON'T  disclose  vulnerabilities  (to  the  vendor)  -  this  includes
potential damages should the vulnerability be used. This is the law
over here if you have the PSF statute.


-- 
http://blog.zoller.lu
Thierry Zoller


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/