lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:28:03 +0530
From: rajendra prasad <rajendra.palnaty@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Why the IPS product designers concentrate on
	server side protection? why they are missing client protection

Hi List,

I have started this discussion with respect to Network IPS.

Thanks
Rajendra

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM, rajendra prasad
<rajendra.palnaty@...il.com>wrote:

> Hi List,
>
> I am putting my thoughts on this, please share your thoughts, comments.
>
> Request length is less than the response length.So, processing small amount
> of data is better than of processing bulk data. Response may have encrypted
> data. Buffering all the client-server transactions and validating signatures
> on them is difficult. Even though buffered, client data may not be in the
> plain text. Embedding all the client encryption/decryption process on the
> fly is not possible, even though ips gathered key values of clients.Most of
> the client protection is done by anti-virus. So, concentrating client
> attacks at IPS level is not so needed.
>
>
> Thanks
> Rajendra
>
>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ