full-disclosure - Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:40:07 +0800
From: YGN Ethical Hacker Group <lists@...g.net>
To: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
	paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au
Subject: Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL
 Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll)

I must say I can't take your word according to my testing.
I've tested on Clean Licensed Windows 7 Professional Edition 64-bit
with latest windows updates applied (as of Today -sept 09 2010). I
used Acros Security's 64 bit demo.

Should I make movie to prove that like
1- Updating Windows (check for updates) ,
2 - Go to \\www.binaryplanting.com\demo\windows_address_book_64
3 - See the popup box

?







On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com> wrote:
> That is what others said, yet it installed automatically on mine.
> The only interaction was that I allowed it to be downloaded and
> installed....not really geeky at all...
>
> I must say you'll have to take my word on it.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:36 AM,  <paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au> wrote:
>> Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> MS issued a patch quite some time ago.
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2264107
>>
>> That is not a "patch", not installed by default: is only for
>> uber-geeks who manually install it. Was issued a week ago, in
>> response to this kerfuffle, not "quite some time ago".
>>
>> Which setting of CWDIllegalInDllSearch did you choose: was it
>> 0xFFFFFFFF which may be "safe", but is known to break Outlook
>> (and others), as noted in
>>
>>  DLL hijacking vulnerabilities
>>  http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9445
>>
>> (geeks can add further tweaks to the registry to fix).
>>
>> Cheers, Paul
>>
>> Paul Szabo   psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
>> School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of Sydney    Australia
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/