full-disclosure - Re: the real stuxnet authors plz stand up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:54:23 -0700
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: kenneth@...rt.ca
Cc: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: the real stuxnet authors plz stand up

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Kenneth Voort <kenneth@...rt.ca> wrote:
> Get real...

i did not say bushehr was not impacted; a side effect of the re-use of
same real-time PLC workflow controller there resulted in cluster fuck
and non-operation.

however, the target was centrifuges and in this regard, it worked
perfectly: the only outward signs of interest at natanz and qom while
affected was then un-explained 2x to 4x under-yield from the
cascades...  the running total spinning looked nice though - steady
progress! heh

in any case, you confuse me with someone who has something to say.
really EOT this time...

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/