full-disclosure - Re: verizon vs m$

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 07:16:34 -0500
From: Larry Seltzer <larry@...ryseltzer.com>
To: Dan Kaminsky <dan@...para.com>, Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: verizon vs m$

>>> 2. some interpret it as a feature and some as a bug?

> Does it have to be either?

It sounds to me as if this is a deliberate design decision, and people are
disagreeing over the severity of its implications.

LJS

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/