| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:34:24 +0100 From: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists@...osecurity.ch> To: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: An idea of leaking alternative to wikileaks On 15/12/10 12.24, Christian Sciberras wrote: > > Which kind of trouble you refer to? It's nice to ear about understanding > > and risks analysis on that stuff. > > Libel, fraud, sharing of illegal material. > > Hey, if you're really intent on going along with this, be my guest. > I'll be watching > the drama fold from afar. Same kind of stuff that happened with/to > Wikileaks. > A momentary hit/fad/hype and the next it's laughed of until it's > forgotten... Not to criticitze you but it seems to me that you have not understood which are the differences. Wikileaks does editing and publishing and that was his main source of responsibility. Upcoming leaking methods doesn't do, like this openleak concept and the http://openleaks.org that daniel berg (ex-wikileaks) is setting up. http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/12/09/how-openleaks-the-first-wikileaks-spinoff-will-work/ We'll probably see a lot of different approaches to leak management, from the easier and dirty one to the most complex one. It's precious raw material for media, doesn't expect that it will not get a value. Cheers -naif _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists