lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:01:15 +0000 From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@...merofgod.com> To: Zach C <fxchip@...il.com> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, "Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>, "lists@...com.org" <lists@...com.org> Subject: Re: Getting Off the Patch >-----Original Message----- >From: Zach C [mailto:fxchip@...il.com] >Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:31 PM >To: Thor (Hammer of God) >Cc: lists@...com.org; Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu; phocean; full- >disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk >Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Getting Off the Patch > >Just on top of this, I would like to ask a question of Pete in the form of an >example. >Just on top of this, I would like to ask a question of Pete in the form of an >example. Excellent example. I'd like to also throw one in that has network connectivity consequences. Regarding SQL Slammer - what would have given 100% protection from Slammer. Outside of the obvious ones like firewalls and such which are already deployed. That's a "real life" example, and I'm interesting in what controls would have already been in place. t _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists