full-disclosure - Re: (this thread is now about porn).‏

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:51:21 +0000
From: "Rankin, James R" <kz20fl@...glemail.com>
To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>,
	"Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 
	(this thread is now about porn).‏

Sue me. Dickhead. My contribution here is over. Don't forget about the train.

Bye,

Typed frustratingly slowly on my BlackBerry® wireless device

-----Original Message-----
From: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:49:46 
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu<Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>; kz20fl@...glemail.com<kz20fl@...glemail.com>
Reply-To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk<full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] (this thread is now abo
 ut porn).‏

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:04 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> You *do* realize we have very little proof that the entity posting
> as Cal isn't a sock puppet of Andrew's creation, to further his vendetta
> against full disclosure because it helps the cyber-terrorists?  It's the
> sort of thing that one of England's top cyber-security experts would do,
> isn't it? :)

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Rankin, James R <kz20fl@...glemail.com> wrote:
> I am an alter ego of netty's that he has invented to argue with in case the voices in his head stop talking about national security

The right to free expression can be restricted if this is necessary to protect the reputation of others. The law of defamation allows persons who consider that their reputation has been or may be harmed by statements made by others to sue for damages or to prevent the making of those statments. http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/right-of-free-expression/defamation/index.html

You're treading on very thin ice.

Andrew

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/