lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:13:05 -0500
From: adam <adam@...sy.net>
To: Darren Martyn <d.martyn.fulldisclosure@...il.com>
Cc: secn3t@...il.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: VPN providers and any providers in general...

Depends entirely on circumstance and the severity of each crime, also
depends on country A's stance on all of it. It's entirely possible that the
person be tried and convicted in country A and then on release, be
extradited to country B and C for the crimes committed there.

No one can say definitively though, especially without knowing exactly what
crimes had been committed, the severity of each crime, and specifically
which countries were involved.

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Darren Martyn <
d.martyn.fulldisclosure@...il.com> wrote:

> Quick question regarding the extradition stuff. Say hacker X was caught in
> country A, for cyber crimes in country A, but had also comitted crimes
> against servers in countries B and C. Would B and C have any right to
> extradite him/her or would they merely be tried for said crimes in country
> A? (assuming country A brought them to trial in the end).
>
> Anyone have a definitive answer?
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 5:50 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:16:11 +1000, xD 0x41 said:
>>
>> > As you also said, murder is a no brainer in any place...well, maybe not
>> iraq
>> > or afghanistan just yet :P lol..
>>
>> Iraq, for all its problems, is still a place with a somewhat functional
>> judicial system. The court system may be broken, but you in general *will*
>> at
>> least appear in a courtroom with a judge and be pronounced guilty before
>> you're
>> punished.
>>
>> I was actually thinking more along the lines of  totally failed states
>> such as
>> Somalia, Sudan, or the contested parts of Afghanistan, where you can't be
>> tried
>> for murder because there isn't a court to try you *in*.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ