lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:48:20 -0700 From: Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org> To: noloader@...il.com Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... On 10/3/2011 12:37 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Laurelai<laurelai@...echan.org> wrote: >> On 10/3/2011 12:16 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Laurelai<laurelai@...echan.org> wrote: >> >> On 10/3/2011 10:42 AM, Antony widmal wrote: >> >> Using an external VPN provider to cover your trace clearly shows your >> incompetency and your idiot assumption. >> Trying to blame the VPN provider rather than accepting your mistake >> and learning from it clearly show your 3 years old mentality. >> >> Also, could you please stop posting as GLOW Xd as well ? >> We do not need your schizophrenic script kiddie "lolololol", "xD", >> hugs, spamming on this mailing list. >> >> You being on this mailing list is once again not the best idea. >> >> Thanks, >> Antony >> >> Actually XD and me are two different people. Second issues of privacy >> are always relevant, not understanding that law abiding individuals >> should always be concerned about companies that hand over personal info >> at the request of an authority figure are the ones with three year old >> mentalities. >> >> maybe they are law abiding companies? :) >> this whole fuss wouldn't have happened, if everybody could just stay a >> law abiding citizen. >> >> The idea that "if you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry >> about" assumes that the government is full of good people that would not >> abuse their power, ever. Even if this were true now, we cannot be sure it'll >> be true in the future and its damn sure not true now. > Definetly not true in the past. Confer: Martin Luther King was > subjected to tens of thousands of illegal wire taps by the FBI because > he (and a lot of other people) felt black folks should get the same > rights as white folks. > > The guy who did it was honored in death, and the bureau he helped > shape actually carries "fidelity" and "integrity" in their motto. > Twisted but true. > > Jeff I am glad there are people here who understand the need for real privacy in the modern age. The US Government has proven *repeatedly* that the more power it has the less trustworthy it is especially when it comes to privacy concerns. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists