Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:04:01 +0000
From: Dan Ballance <tzewang.dorje@...il.com>
To: Mario Vilas <mvilas@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

Would scapy be a suitable tool to attempt this kind of packet manipulation
with? I'm a programmer, but I'm new to this kind of
network/packet-level/security scripting.

What tools / frameworks / languages etc do you guys use to write these
kinds of exploit scripts?

cheers,

dan :)

(keep forgetting I need to reply-all on this list)

On 11 November 2011 17:01, Mario Vilas <mvilas@...il.com> wrote:

> I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst@...il.com>wrote:
>
>> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I
>> was thinking at least.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@...il.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:
>> >> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days
>> >> to send a packet, my butt.
>> >> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with
>> >> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only
>> >> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger
>> >> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like
>> >> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks...
>> >> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src
>> >> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to
>> >> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open
>> >> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal
>> >> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so ,
>> >> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3
>> >> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with
>> >> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing,
>> >> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..
>> >
>> > I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either
>> > with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know
>> > what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from
>> > what I can make of your writing).
>> >
>> > No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you
>> > are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights
> the enemy of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When
> the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the
> people.”
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists