lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:20:53 +1100 From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> To: Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) I have said, when the author wants to, and when hes ready to, i am sure he will. On 12 November 2011 00:54, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@...il.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote: >> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days >> to send a packet, my butt. >> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with >> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only >> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger >> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like >> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks... >> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src >> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to >> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open >> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal >> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so , >> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3 >> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with >> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing, >> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another.. > > I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either > with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know > what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from > what I can make of your writing). > > No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you > are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD. > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists