lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:29:58 +1100 From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> To: Dan Ballance <tzewang.dorje@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Would scapy be a suitable tool to attempt this kind of packet manipulation with? I'm a programmer, but I'm new to this kind of network/packet-level/security scripting. Yes, scapy + impacket./..would probably help u with the python side... On 12 November 2011 04:04, Dan Ballance <tzewang.dorje@...il.com> wrote: > Would scapy be a suitable tool to attempt this kind of packet manipulation > with? I'm a programmer, but I'm new to this kind of > network/packet-level/security scripting. > What tools / frameworks / languages etc do you guys use to write these kinds > of exploit scripts? > cheers, > dan :) > (keep forgetting I need to reply-all on this list) > On 11 November 2011 17:01, Mario Vilas <mvilas@...il.com> wrote: >> >> I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit. >> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst@...il.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I >>> was thinking at least. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@...il.com> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote: >>> >> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days >>> >> to send a packet, my butt. >>> >> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with >>> >> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only >>> >> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger >>> >> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like >>> >> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks... >>> >> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src >>> >> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to >>> >> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open >>> >> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal >>> >> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so , >>> >> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3 >>> >> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with >>> >> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing, >>> >> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another.. >>> > >>> > I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either >>> > with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know >>> > what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from >>> > what I can make of your writing). >>> > >>> > No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you >>> > are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> >> >> >> -- >> “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights >> the enemy of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When >> the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the >> people.” >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists