full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:51:32 -0800
From: Antony widmal <antony.widmal@...il.com>
To: secn3t@...il.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

Typical S-K behavior; talk about stuff he has nfi.

Le 11 nov. 2011 19:15, "xD 0x41" <secn3t@...il.com> a écrit :
>
> 0day for ms, is not so hard, and, i hjave already explained one of
> them to some people
>
> 0day for ms, is not so hard, and, i hjave already explained one of
> them to some people :)
> but, i dont care, because, you dont have it, and, i do.
> so, many people have 0days...whats wrong with this ? i found my own,
> and, thats why i am happy to keep them. and, as i said, one, i have
> discussed and, made a working scanner binary for.. so, i guess that
> much, some people do know is true...
> so, thats not rare atall.. you want to wonder about just wibndows,
> imagine linux... and, there is , the imagination, is big there and
> there is plenty and plenty of attacks still available on fully patched
> NON grsec kernels :)
> and yes, i have 0days of those, also.
> enjoy.some get lucky, others just...suck..
>
>
> On 12 November 2011 13:42, baqstabz <baqstabz@...il.com> wrote:
> > Judging by your posts I would go out on the edge and say that you have
> about
> > as much chance of having 0-day (yes, that is including xxs) as your
> mommy.
> > face it lol
> >
> > Now please, stfu son, you're sounding like a total tardlump; otherwise we
> > will have to unleash the dragons and let you see what a 10k botnet feels
> > like.
> >
> >
> > On 11/11/2011 23:26, xD 0x41 wrote:
> >>
> >> Indeeed.
> >> Seeing how the wolves are, i ceertainly would bnot release it.
> >> i am only saying, I am using cpp, and windows, and, the exploit
> >> bypasses all protections, but, since you guys dont have the actual
> >> real poc for it, i guess, i would not be saying anything more, and,
> >> ill be leaving it, for the proper poc author, to make that choice,
> >> wich, personally, i would never handout to a bunch of disrepectful
> >> people, as i see, when this is, nothing, i habve held onto, atleast 2
> >> GOOd MS 0days for years, you rally think, i will handout the right way
> >> todo this ?
> >> pfft..   yer right, lets go hand everyone the ms bug :PP ofc, why
> >> would i ever not want a 10 k botnet up in a day...  hell yea!
> >> i would neverm, give more about this, on this topic, because, i have
> >> seen how people are now on this list and, saddens me that half of you
> >> do not have a brain. unfortunately..and, saince i dont wish to break
> >> any deals made with ms etc, then, i cannot say anything, i dont know,
> >> why this is hard to understand..and, i will NOT handout a working
> >> scanner, regardless...
> >> and, believe it, it does NOT take 49days atall to exploit... theres
> >> alot, you dont know..yet.
> >>
> >> dont ask me further, please.
> >> i should never have even said anything, again, i wont make that
> >> mistake again, the proof, will as always be n the pudding...
> >> later.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12 November 2011 10:17, Michal Zalewski<lcamtuf@...edump.cx>  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> next time, i wont say shit, and, believe it.
> >>>
> >>> Well it's just that the attack you are describing will be thwarted by
> >>> setting a sticky bit on /tmp, and you have not demonstrated otherwise.
> >>>
> >>> /mz
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/