full-disclosure - Re: Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response, Philosophy of Information Security

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 22:32:55 -0800
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: Shyaam Sundhar <shyaam@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response,
 Philosophy of Information Security

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Shyaam Sundhar <shyaam@...il.com> wrote:
> ...
> why are people sloppy by nature when it comes to
> security?

this is like asking for the origin of existence; a mystery to the end!

> Why is security still considered as a blanket as opposed to the
> core of any system?

build security in: a radical concept!

instead quality is conferred second rate status, lucre and expedience
trump effectiveness, and short sighted competition creates cavities of
vulnerability where only broad cooperation can protect.

an endless playground for the curious and devious to deceive, thwart,
and threaten at will.

> PS: I am totally wrong and I know that ;)

infosec is totally wrong as industry, too few know that! ;P

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/