full-disclosure - Re: Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 16:21:51 -0800
From: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 13:50,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:25:35 EST, Shyaam Sundhar said:
>
>> Although, once they have gained popularity and to a stage where a garage
>> office becomes a shop floor and a @home biz becomes a rent-a-million$-building
>> office, it is time to shift priorities.
>
> If finding people who are competent enough to secure a payroll system for a
> company of 10 people is difficult, what makes you think that it's easy to find
> people who can secure the systems for a company of 1,000?

I would think it would be easier, because a company of 1,000 is much
more likely to have an actual budget for this kind of stuff than a
company of 10, or 100. But, still not as easy as for a company of
10,000, or 100,000.

Kurt

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/