lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:57:46 +0100
From: "Giles Coochey" <giles@...chey.net>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response

On Thu, January 12, 2012 10:47, doc mombasa wrote:
> ok obviously you never worked for a big corporate entity :)
> sure standing up to them is fine
> after shouting about the bug for 4 months i thought bah why bother its
> their asses not mine
> just going in and fixing a bug without the mandate is usually not a good
> idea (if you want to keep your job so you can pay your bills that is..)
>

If you have been hired by the company in a security capacity (because they
budgeted for that need, for whatever reason), and you have not lost your
credibility with them (because you're some spotty script kiddie and can
converse with them at a business level), then I've always found that you
are listened to, taken very seriously and usually have a direct route to
the CEO, CIO, COO or the whole board of directors.
If you're not listened to on the matters of security, then security is
probably a passtime of yours and not the main role of your employment, or
you're just one of those annoying geeky spotty script kiddies who moans
about whatever is getting the bad press at the moment.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists