full-disclosure - Re: pidgin OTR information leakage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:21:10 +0000
From: Rich Pieri <ratinox@....EDU>
To: Michele Orru <antisnatchor@...il.com>
Cc: "<bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>" <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>,
	"<full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	Jann Horn <jannhorn@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: pidgin OTR information leakage

On Feb 27, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Michele Orru wrote:
> I think you didn't understood the content of the advisory.
> If there are 10 non-root users in an Ubuntu machine for example,
> if user 1 is using pidgin with OTR compiled with DBUS, then user 2 to 10
> can see what user 1 pidgin conversation.

This is not what the OP or CVE describe:

>> plaintext. This makes it possible for attackers that have gained 
>> user-level access on a host, to listen in on private conversations 
>> associated with the victim account.

Which I read as: if I compromise user1's account then I can snoop user1's DBUS sessions.  It says nothing about me being able to snoop user2's sessions.  The leading phrase about attackers gaining user-level access implies that legitimate users on a system are not a relevant issue.

I believe that clarification is in order.

-- 
Rich Pieri <ratinox@....EDU>
MIT Laboratory for Nuclear Science

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/