full-disclosure - Re: Info about attack trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:49:19 +0300
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
To: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Info about attack trees

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 01:50:36PM -0700, coderman wrote:
> a pedant would call them exploit graphs ;)
>

hahaha, how many buzzwords for seemingly simple stuff :)

some buzzwords you can use for profit:

division by _zero_, _integer_ overflow, attack _vector_, attack
_vector space_ [1], attack _curve_, attack _surface_, attack
_abelian surface_ [1], attack _group law_ [1] , attack _tree_, 
attack _graph_, attack _constrained path on graph_ [1], 
attack _turing machine_ [1], attack halting _problem_ [1].

[1] might not be in general usage as of Mon May 28 EEST 2012

spam v

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/