full-disclosure - Re: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:31:50 +0000
From: yuange <yuange1975@...mail.com>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure
	vulnerability

somebody's poc

http://weibo.com/p/1005051838905715/weibo?from=page_100505_home&wvr=5.1&mod=weibomore#3610572387549394  

微软呀，要怎么说你们呢。3个月的沟通不承认，一定要POC才承认，这么简单的代码看不懂吗？说得那么明白写POC真的有那么难吗？实在太磨叽了。

这个漏洞你们还感谢360吗？不是我不配合，3个月的沟通，不给POC就关闭这个漏洞的修补。顺便问一声，那几个漏洞修补还要花几个月呀？

From: yuange1975@...mail.com
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:22:18 +0000

#0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability http://t.cn/zQJYHgA  .Technical challenge how to write exploit code?
漏洞报告已经说得很明白，指出问题代码，怎么定位代码。鉴于微软一次次的纠缠于需要提供POC，那就让大家来写POC吧，写好记得发一份给微软。 ：）
https://twitter.com/yuange75  我的观点：
#antiNSA 现在APT的大环境下，POC代码、EXP利用技术都是宝贵资源，不想因为中间环节被控制或者SNIFFER而丢失这些宝贵资源，现在坚定报告漏洞不提供POC和EXP，除非有偿的漏洞报告。反汇编指出问题代码点，对于漏洞修补已经提供了足够的重要信息了，要想POC自己分析。

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/