lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:54:08 +1000
From: "Ivan .Heca" <ivanhec@...il.com>
To: David Tomaschik <david@...temoverlord.com>
Cc: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: Re: [FD] heartbleed OpenSSL bug CVE-2014-0160

In what appears to be his first comments to the media since the bug was
uncovered, Robin Seggelmann said how the bug made its way into live code
could "be explained pretty easily".

http://m.smh.com.au/it-pro/security-it/man-who-introduced-serious-heartbleed-security-flaw-denies-he-inserted-it-deliberately-20140410-zqta1.html
On 11/04/2014 7:15 AM, "David Tomaschik" <david@...temoverlord.com> wrote:

> Apache wouldn't have anything in its logs, nor would any application.
>  OpenSSL sees the heartbeat request and responds on its own, the fact that
> a heartbeat occurred never hits the application (it stays entirely within
> libssl).
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Ingo Schmitt <
> ingo.schmitt@...arysignals.net> wrote:
>
> > Is it traceable with the log files when an (successful) attack occurred?
> >
> > If yes, we could determine whether the vuln has been used by the bad
> > guys before. I'm no expert in dealing with apache log files, so I ask
> > you ;)
> >
> >
> > On 04/08/14 02:10, Kirils Solovjovs wrote:
> > > We are doomed.
> > >
> > > Description: http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
> > > Article dedicated to the bug: http://heartbleed.com/
> > > Tool to check if TLS heartbeat extension is supported:
> > > http://possible.lv/tools/hb/
> > >
> > > A missing bounds check in the handling of the TLS heartbeat extension
> > > can be used to reveal up to 64kB of memory to a connected client or
> > server.
> > >
> > > 1.0.1[ abcdef] affected.
> > >
> > >
> > > P.S. Happy Monday!
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> > > http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> > > Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
> > >
> >
> > --
> > --\___________________________________________________
> > ingo.schmitt@...arysignals.net - GnuPG ID: 0xAFD687D2 |
> > FP: 7418 77A6 4B59 AF90 4A11 1CCE 91C9 FF1B AFD6 87D2 |
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> > http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> > Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> David Tomaschik
> OpenPGP: 0x5DEA789B
> http://systemoverlord.com
> david@...temoverlord.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
>

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ