full-disclosure

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:51:15 -0300
From: Pablo <paa.listas@...il.com>
To: Full Disclosure Mailing List <fulldisclosure@...lists.org>
Subject: [FD] Should it be better ...

Should it be better to include the Advisory Details/exploit/code in the 
body of the email to FD, and not in a link to a blog/site/company so the 
list archive will be an archive and not a index to some, possible down, 
link?

I saw some reports using this format. It is good for a blog or site 
traffic, but in time, if that sites/blog/entry is deleted or down, the 
de FD archive (and its mirrors) will point to nothing usefull.

I am wrong or it is a good idea?

Sorry for my  poor english.

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives