full-disclosure - Re: [FD] several issues in SQLite (+ catching up on several other bugs)

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:31:02 -0700
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
To: noloader@...il.com
Cc: "fulldisclosure@...lists.org" <fulldisclosure@...lists.org>,
	bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: [FD] several issues in SQLite (+ catching up on several other
	bugs)

> Clang and its analyzers found a number of issues a couple of years
> ago. As far as I know, the results were dismissed. See "Clang 3.3 and
> Scan-Build results",

Well, I can kinda sympathize. Somebody took one of my OSS projects
(p0f) and ran it through a static analyzer a while ago (the analyzer
shall remain nameless, but was one of the major ones). The results
were just pages and pages of nonsensical findings, interspersed with
non-specific style recommendations.

An experience like that can quickly divide developers into two camps:
the "not sure, but let me spend a week to address everything, just in
case" one, and the "show me faulting test cases or get lost" bunch.

I've heard it summed up this way: when a particular check is stable
and reliable enough to be actually useful to most developers, it stops
being called "static analysis" and becomes a "standard compiler
warning" =)

/mz

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives