linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext3_getblk should handle HOLE correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Sep 2006 11:45:00 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Will Simoneau <simoneau@....uri.edu>, cmm@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3_getblk should handle HOLE correctly

On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:39:06 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Its been reported that ext3_getblk() is not doing the right thing
> and triggering following WARN():
> 
> BUG: warning at fs/ext3/inode.c:1016/ext3_getblk()
>  <c01c5140> ext3_getblk+0x98/0x2a6  <c03b2806> md_wakeup_thread
> +0x26/0x2a
>  <c01c536d> ext3_bread+0x1f/0x88  <c01cedf9> ext3_quota_read+0x136/0x1ae
>  <c018b683> v1_read_dqblk+0x61/0xac  <c0188f32> dquot_acquire+0xf6/0x107
>  <c01ceaba> ext3_acquire_dquot+0x46/0x68  <c01897d4> dqget+0x155/0x1e7
>  <c018a97b> dquot_transfer+0x3e0/0x3e9  <c016fe52> dput+0x23/0x13e
>  <c01c7986> ext3_setattr+0xc3/0x240  <c0120f66> current_fs_time
> +0x52/0x6a
>  <c017320e> notify_change+0x2bd/0x30d  <c0159246> chown_common+0x9c/0xc5
>  <c02a222c> strncpy_from_user+0x3b/0x68  <c0167fe6> do_path_lookup
> +0xdf/0x266
>  <c016841b> __user_walk_fd+0x44/0x5a  <c01592b9> sys_chown+0x4a/0x55
>  <c015a43c> vfs_write+0xe7/0x13c  <c01695d4> sys_mkdir+0x1f/0x23
>  <c0102a97> syscall_call+0x7/0xb 
> 
> Looking at the code, it looks like its not handle HOLE correctly.
> It ends up returning -EIO.

Strange.  The fs should be spewing these warnings all over the place.  For
some reason this code is hard to trigger.  Why??

> -	if (err == 1) {
> +	/*
> +	 * ext3_get_blocks_handle() returns number of blocks
> +	 * mapped. 0 in case of a HOLE.
> +	 */
> +	if (err > 0) {
>  		err = 0;
> -	} else if (err >= 0) {
> -		WARN_ON(1);
> -		err = -EIO;
>  	}

That removes the warning if ext3_get_blocks_handle() returned a positive
number greater than one.  And it looks like we still need debugging support
in this area.

I reworked it like this:

--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c~ext3_getblk-should-handle-hole-correctly
+++ a/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -1010,11 +1010,14 @@ struct buffer_head *ext3_getblk(handle_t
 	buffer_trace_init(&dummy.b_history);
 	err = ext3_get_blocks_handle(handle, inode, block, 1,
 					&dummy, create, 1);
-	if (err == 1) {
+	/*
+	 * ext3_get_blocks_handle() returns number of blocks
+	 * mapped. 0 in case of a HOLE.
+	 */
+	if (err > 0) {
+		if (err > 1)
+			WARN_ON(1);
 		err = 0;
-	} else if (err >= 0) {
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		err = -EIO;
 	}
 	*errp = err;
 	if (!err && buffer_mapped(&dummy)) {
_

ie:

	/*
	 * ext3_get_blocks_handle() returns number of blocks
	 * mapped. 0 in case of a HOLE.
	 */
	if (err > 0) {
		if (err > 1)
			WARN_ON(1);
		err = 0;
	}
	*errp = err;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html