| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:52:29 +0300
From: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
To: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>
Cc: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ext4-delayed-allocation.patch
ah, you're right. thanks!
thanks, Alex
>>>>> Valerie Clement (VC) writes:
VC> Hi Alex,
VC> I tested your patch on my system with a 20TB device, but some tests
VC> failed. Looking at the code, I saw that the support of 48-bit block
VC> number in extents is lacking.
VC> I made some changes in the code (see the patch in attachment) and now
VC> all my tests are OK.
VC> The patch is not complete, I didn't update calls to wb_debug() which
VC> dump "ee_start".
VC> Hope this helps.
VC> Valérie
VC> Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/fs/ext4/writeback.c
VC> ===================================================================
VC> --- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/fs/ext4/writeback.c 2007-01-09 18:41:27.000000000 +0100
VC> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/fs/ext4/writeback.c 2007-01-11 13:25:38.000000000 +0100
VC> @@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ static int ext4_wb_submit_extent(struct
VC> struct inode *inode = wc->mapping->host;
VC> int blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
VC> struct page *page;
VC> - unsigned long blk, off, len, remain;
VC> + ext4_fsblk_t off;
VC> + unsigned long blk, len, remain;
VC> unsigned long pstart, plen, prev;
VC> struct bio *bio = NULL;
VC> int nr_pages;
VC> @@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ alloc_new_bio:
VC> nr_pages = (ex->ee_len - (blk - ex->ee_block));
VC> nr_pages = (nr_pages >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blkbits));
VC> off = ex->ee_start + (blk - ex->ee_block);
VC> + off |= (ext4_fsblk_t) ex->ee_start_hi << 32;
VC> bio = ext4_wb_bio_alloc(inode, off, nr_pages + 2);
VC> if (bio == NULL)
VC> return -ENOMEM;
VC> @@ -377,7 +379,9 @@ ext4_wb_find_goal(struct inode *inode, s
VC> /* try to predict block placement */
VC> if ((ex = path[depth].p_ext))
VC> - return ex->ee_start + (block - ex->ee_block);
VC> + return ((ex->ee_start
VC> + | ((ext4_fsblk_t) ex->ee_start_hi << 32))
VC> + + (block - ex->ee_block);
VC> /* it looks index is empty
VC> * try to find starting from index itself */
VC> @@ -416,7 +420,8 @@ static int ext4_wb_handle_extent(struct
VC> (unsigned) ec->ec_block,
VC> (unsigned) ec->ec_len,
VC> (unsigned) ec->ec_start);
VC> - nex.ee_start = ec->ec_start;
VC> + nex.ee_start = ec->ec_start & 0xffffffff;
VC> + nex.ee_start_hi = (ec->ec_start >> 32) & 0xffff;
VC> nex.ee_block = ec->ec_block;
VC> nex.ee_len = ec->ec_len;
VC> err = ext4_wb_submit_extent(wc, NULL, &nex, 0);
VC> @@ -488,8 +493,8 @@ static int ext4_wb_handle_extent(struct
VC> pblock, count, inode->i_ino, ec->ec_len);
VC> /* insert new extent */
VC> - nex.ee_start = pblock;
VC> - nex.ee_start_hi = 0;
VC> + nex.ee_start = pblock & 0xffffffff;
VC> + nex.ee_start_hi = (pblock >> 32) & 0xffff;
VC> nex.ee_len = count;
VC> nex.ee_block = ec->ec_block;
VC> err = ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle, inode, path, &nex);
VC> @@ -520,7 +525,9 @@ static int ext4_wb_handle_extent(struct
VC> /* block have been allocated for data, so time to drop dirty
VC> * in correspondend buffer_heads to prevent corruptions */
VC> for (i = 0; i < nex.ee_len; i++)
VC> - unmap_underlying_metadata(sb->s_bdev, nex.ee_start + i);
VC> + unmap_underlying_metadata(sb->s_bdev,
VC> + ((ext4_fsblk_t) nex.ee_start_hi << 32)
VC> + + nex.ee_start + i);
VC> /* correct on-disk inode size */
VC> if (nex.ee_len > 0) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists