linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC] [patch 0/3] i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:40:34 -0800
From:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To:	Cordenner jean noel <jean-noel.cordenner@...l.net>
CC:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch 0/3] i_version update for ext4

Cordenner jean noel wrote:
> Andreas Dilger a écrit :
> 
>> On Jan 23, 2007  18:23 +0100, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
>>
>>> I've updated what was previously the change attribute patch for ext4
>>> initially posted by Alexandre Ratchov. The previous patch was
>>> introducing a change_attribute field, now it uses the i_version field of
>>> the inode.
>>>
>>> The i_version field is a counter that is set on every inode creation and
>>> that is incremented every time the inode data is modified (similarly to
>>> the "ctime" time-stamp).
>>> The aim is to fulfill NFSv4 requirements for rfc3530.
>>> For the moent, the counter is only a 32bit value but it is planned to be
>>> 64bit as required.
>>>
>>> The patch is divided into 3 parts, the vfs layer, the ext4 specific code
>>> and an user part to check i_version changes via stat.
>>
>>
>> Have you had a chance to look at the performance impact of this change
>> (possible with oprofile)?  Always marking the inodes dirty for ext3
>> may have some noticable overhead.
>>
> 
> I did some tests using fileop with the previous version of the patch
> which was very similar. I was surprised that there was no noticable
> overhead:
>  http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/change_attribute/index.html
> 
> I will use oprofile to check it again.

Could we just increment the counter each time the mtime is modifies(not 
the ctime)? Is that enough to serve NFSv4 need?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html